Biyernes, Oktubre 11, 2013

Lesson 17: Assessment in a Constructive, Technology-Supported Learning



SUMMARY:




        Constructivist view assessment as a

 process that involves both the instructor and the student. 

Educators who prefer to use constructive methods and

 principles in evaluating student work have several different 

avenues to choose from that can help enhance the learning 

experience of students.


Principles of Assessment in a Constructive Classroom
      One principle of assessment in a constructive 

classroom is not to isolate evaluation as a single exercise.

 Constructive often see learning as a cyclical process. 

Since the shape of a circle has no beginning and no end,

 then the mark of where to assess could become blurry.

 Constructivist do not see assessment as an ending activity,

 but rather an ongoing process that helps the student continue

 to learn. 

They isolated “Five Es" of constructivism: Engage, Explore,

 Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate. Not only is assessment 

its own category (evaluate), but it is also interwoven throughout

 each of the other stages of the learning process.


Similarities and Differences Between
 Constructivist and Traditional Assessment


Similarities
·         ·         Both types of assessment can take on a variety of formats: paper and pencil, physical hands on 
·         experience, or some type of exchange.
·                  The phrasing and use of critical thinking terminology in
·          questioning can also be similar.
·         ·         Instructors in traditional classroom also use assessments
·          in order to plan lessons and develop activities.
Difference

      Responses to traditional questions will also require 

more than a 'yes' or 'no' answer. However, the idea

 that interactive feedback occurs between evaluators and

 learners as well as the concept of judging the active 

construction of thinking as well as the outcome are 

greater priorities to the constructivist assessor than a

 traditional method of evaluation.

·         ·         Another difference lies in the support of

·         standardized testing. Traditional learning environments

·          support standardized testing and make many educational 

·         decisions off of those scores. Constructivist have a very 

·         negative view of this particular testing vehicle. Constructivist

·          prefer that assessments have more of a 'real-life' application. 

·         The types of assessment preferred by constructivist

·          would be: authentic, performance, or portfolio assessment.

·          These types of assessment, according to Reeves & Odey,

·          require more genuine thought from the learner and provide

·         a more stimulating form of evaluation than traditional classroom

·         testing.
REFLECTION: 
I leaned that constructivist method is an effective technique of a teacher its because there is an open communication of the two: teacher and student. By this method we can see the one principle of teaching which "learning is an active process".

answer this:   


 

Walang komento:

Mag-post ng isang Komento